What’s
closest to Science than Poetry? “All
other things”, you may say. I’ll tell
you may be wrong, my friend!
As the
Canadian poet Christian Bok said, there’s a long relation between science and
poetry since Newton . Alexander Pope would write “God
said let there be Newton and All was Light,” celebrating
with his generation the beauty of the new physics changing the view of the
world.
The British
poet Ruth Padel says
eloquently in her article for The Guardian, the
science of poetry, the poetry of science: “Scientia means
"knowledge:" science, it seems to me, is not about facts; it is about
thinking about facts.” As she also
clarifies, poetry and science, both, share the need of an abstract insight to
be worked though precision in order to explain the details of a particular idea
or point of view.
Poetry was
first written to express such questions as why are we here, and what is the
world that surrounds us made of? All the
modern science derivates from philosophy and the base was exactly the same –
this inherent characteristic of mankind that is the curiosity that brings us
beyond where our feet touch. Metaphors
are commonly used as a tool to scientific discovery and to lyric. Einstein himself would say that imagination
is more important than knowledge, and I have to agree that it is the main
reason for why we are still here, lingering through the average expectation of the
extinction rate of our species and, even better, evolving.
A good
scientist and a good poet have one more trace in common that, perhaps, is the
most important: both of them know that they might be proved wrong, that their suppositions are only the best explanation for what they are living at the
moment. This self knowledge allows them
to question answers and correct mistakes, and that is what takes mankind further than we
could only imagine.
Antonio Ereditato,
on his Cern presentation of how they have measured neutrinos traveling above the speed of
light – an experiment that could tumble down the pillars of modern science,
– said carefully as every scientist should do: “When you don't find anything,
then you say 'well, now I'm forced to go out and ask the community to scrutinize
this '. Despite the large significance
of this measurement that you have seen and the stability of the analysis, since
it has a potentially great impact on physics, this motivates the continuation
of our studies in order to find still-unknown systematic effects."
Everything
starts with a question, so the joy is in the journey of the search for truth –
we probably will always get very close to it, but never there; and that’s
exactly the beauty of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment